Author: ujecrh
Date: 11:33:28 03/20/00
Go up one level in this thread
On March 20, 2000 at 08:02:55, Laurence Chen wrote: >On March 20, 2000 at 00:52:37, Georg Langrath wrote: > >>in Aufsess Tournament, Germany many of the programs use Celeron processors. Is >>celeron processors as good as Pentium for chessprograms? >> >>Georg >Celeron's have a FSB of 66 MHz and on-die cache built-in of 128K, a Pentium 3, >the Katmai type, has a FSB of 100 MHz and a L2 cache of 512K. A celeron is a >cheaper version of a Pentium 2, not a Pentium 3. If you were to run all chips >in the same clock speed of 66 MHz, the Pentium 2 is much faster than a Pentium 3 >at that clock speed. However, this is not true for the new Pentium 3 Coppermine >chip. It uses the same on-die cache as the Celeron, however it has 256K of >Cache, and it is much faster than a Pentium 3,Katmai, in the same FSB. >The reason why people buy celeron is OVERCLOCKING, it is very easy to overclock >a Celeron to a much higher speed than the specs, also Pentium 2, and Coppermine >are much easier to overclock than a Pentium 3, Katmai. >Laurence I have run lct2 with crafty both on a PIII550 and Celeron 466 (same hash sizes)and it appears that they run it about the same speed. If some of you are interested I probably still have logs somewhere. Ujecrh
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.