Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 20:29:35 03/20/00
Go up one level in this thread
On March 20, 2000 at 03:49:50, Paulo Soares wrote: >On March 20, 2000 at 00:58:48, Côme wrote: > >>On March 19, 2000 at 22:22:34, Paulo Soares wrote: >> >>>On March 19, 2000 at 21:48:30, Aloisio Ponti Lopes wrote: >>> >>>>...maybe it will be available in the next 2 years. >>>> >>>>A. Ponti >>> >>>Which would be the largest number of pieces to be used in Nalimov >>>Tablebases with 140Mgz? 7, 8, 9? >>> >>>Paulo Soares, from Brazil >> >>Hello, >>IMHO only 6 pieces. >>Best Regards >>Alexandre Côme > >Only 6! How many memory for 7 pieces? >Thanks, >Paulo It is almost certain that 140 gigs won't even hold all the 6's, much less any 7's. Several of the 6 piece files are 2 gigs each (and they don't have any pawns). Figure a 7 will be 60x bigger, and you get the idea that maybe only 1 pawnless 7 on one of those 140 gig drives. :) 7's are a _long_ way off...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.