Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: IM or not IM

Author: Mogens Larsen

Date: 13:01:33 03/21/00

Go up one level in this thread

On March 21, 2000 at 11:20:22, Chessfun wrote:

>To IMHO imply he is weak over the board is wrong:
>Lets look at all the IM's at chessnet at who have a
>lightning rating:
>
>Aldama(IM)   Lightning  2326         55     24      3     82   2331
>apetelin(IM) Lightning  2328         43     56      7    106   2429
>Appel(IM)    Lightning  2748        306     24     12    342   2769
>HHuerter(IM) Lightning  2563        381    193     14    588   2566
>Moussa(IM)   Lightning  2548        936    792    100   1828   2648
>Pawelek(IM)  Lightning  2528         45     25      8     78   2533
>Tissir(IM)   Lightning  2308         24     27      2     53   2394
>Valvo(IM)    Lightning  2165         36     50      4     90   2220
>
>Portilho(IM) Lightning  2420       2449   1779    180   4408   2478
>Seems his rating is higher than 4 of the 8 IM's listed so he obviously
>is experienced. And that after playing 2449 games of lightning and holding
>a rating of 2420 he is not weak over the board.
>
>Thanks.

Don't let them get to you, it's a fine result. You should be proud.

Best wishes...
Mogens

Remember: A show of envy is an insult to oneself.

• Re: IM or not IM Paulo Soares 15:43:04 03/21/00
  • Re: IM or not IM Chessfun 20:56:00 03/21/00
  • Re: IM or not IM Mogens Larsen 16:16:21 03/21/00
    • Re: IM or not IM Paulo Soares 02:57:44 03/22/00
      • Re: IM or not IM Mogens Larsen 03:41:15 03/22/00
        • Re: IM or not IM Paulo Soares 06:36:02 03/22/00
    • Re: IM or not IM blass uri 21:26:47 03/21/00
      • Re: IM or not IM ed 00:53:51 03/22/00

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.