Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: IM or not IM

Author: Mogens Larsen

Date: 16:16:21 03/21/00

Go up one level in this thread

On March 21, 2000 at 18:43:04, Paulo Soares wrote:

>but why a show of envy? Would you be interpreting what  people
>wrote in this thread as a show of envy?
>I don't believe, this would be a serious interpretation
>mistake.
>
>Paulo Soares, from Brazil

Then why did you post a lot about the differences between a postal IM and a FIDE
IM, when there's no FIDE claim in the original post. When compared with the
attention to PilgrimDans win against Rebel Tiger there's an obvious difference.
I would hate to think it's a matter of sexism, but I might be a paranoid
android.

Best wishes...
Mogens

• Re: IM or not IM Paulo Soares 02:57:44 03/22/00
  • Re: IM or not IM Mogens Larsen 03:41:15 03/22/00
    • Re: IM or not IM Paulo Soares 06:36:02 03/22/00
• Re: IM or not IM blass uri 21:26:47 03/21/00
  • Re: IM or not IM ed 00:53:51 03/22/00

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.