Author: Paulo Soares
Date: 02:57:44 03/22/00
Go up one level in this thread
On March 21, 2000 at 19:16:21, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On March 21, 2000 at 18:43:04, Paulo Soares wrote: > >>but why a show of envy? Would you be interpreting what people >>wrote in this thread as a show of envy? >>I don't believe, this would be a serious interpretation >>mistake. >> >>Paulo Soares, from Brazil > >Then why did you post a lot about the differences between a postal IM and a FIDE >IM, when there's no FIDE claim in the original post. When compared with the >attention to PilgrimDans win against Rebel Tiger there's an obvious difference. >I would hate to think it's a matter of sexism, but I might be a paranoid >android. > >Best wishes... >Mogens When a person writes that he/she won a IM, the great majority will think that is a IM FIDE. There is a great difference between a IM FIDE and a IM ICCC, and I wrote that the chess player that Chessfun had win was a IM of postal chess (IM ICCF), although Portilho (IM ICCF) is a strong chess player. I gave the correct information, and I eulogized Chessfun. I consider this very simple and easy of interpreting (Unless my translation of the Portuguese for English is not well done). The one that I don't understand is as other people don't get to interpret everything that was written in a rational and objectifies way, and get to write absurds as " jealousies ", "evil" and even to insinuate another absurd , "sexism". Paulo
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.