Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Amnon in Fritz

Author: Andrew Williams

Date: 03:21:51 03/24/00

Go up one level in this thread


On March 23, 2000 at 14:26:06, Jason Williamson wrote:

>On March 23, 2000 at 08:24:39, Andrew Williams wrote:
>
>>On March 23, 2000 at 07:49:50, Jason Williamson wrote:
>>
>>>On March 23, 2000 at 06:14:22, Andrew Williams wrote:
>>>
>>>>On March 23, 2000 at 05:16:56, Francis Monkman wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On March 23, 2000 at 03:09:33, Jason Williamson wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>I have been running Amnon 5.06 under Fritz and have noticed really WEIRD
>>>>>>pondering by Amnon.  It almost seems that it was just randomly looking at a move
>>>>>>and analysing it, even if said move just dropped a queen in one move, or a piece
>>>>>>or what ever.   Mind you, it plays ok on its own time, and still maintains a
>>>>>>position of one of the top 5 or 6 amatuer chess engines I have.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Jason
>>>>>
>>>>>If I'm not mistaken, this problem is related to the difficulty of extracting a
>>>>>pv line from an MTD(f) search.
>>>>>
>>>>>Francis
>>>>
>>>>This is interesting (to me anyway). My program uses mtd(f) and it extracts
>>>>its PV from the hash table. I found that if the hash table is of a reasonable
>>>>size, the PV for the first several plies is usually OK.
>>>>
>>>>Some figures: I've got a log files from the last few days' play on ICC.
>>>>PostModernist pondered 4515 times in these games and its pondering move
>>>>was right 52% of the time. Obviously this doesn't say anything about the
>>>>quality of the moves it was pondering when it was wrong, but in watching it
>>>>I have only very rarely noticed my program pondering a move that is obviously
>>>>not going to occur.
>>>>
>>>>Is there any way, Jason, to say how often AnMon's pondering move is correct?
>>>>Even an approximation would be interesting.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Andrew
>>>
>>>
>>>Lets say 1 in 10 would be generous.  Compared to other engines, Anmon was
>>>pondering quite bizzare.  I mean, with PM, how often will PM ponder a move that
>>>puts a piece enprise?
>>
>>OK. That is odd. What size hash table has it got? Does it ever fail to produce
>>a move at the root?
>>
>>As for PM, I think this happens *very* rarely. I've seen that maybe four
>>or five times since PM has been online, but of course I don't watch every
>>game, nor do I inspect every log file it generates.
>>
>>
>>Andrew
>
>
>Im a little unclear as to what you mean "fail to produce a move a root".  If
>mean failing to generate a line to ponder, no I never noticed that.  As to the
>hash I was using 32M.
>
>Jason

Sorry, I miswrote. You interpreted it correctly, however. Thanks.

Andrew




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.