Author: blass uri
Date: 07:21:14 03/25/00
Go up one level in this thread
On March 25, 2000 at 08:56:05, Peter Kasinski wrote: > >Junior 6a - 2 x Celeron 563 Mhz, 256 Mb hash, 32 Mb tablebase hash >Tiger 12e - P3 667 Mhz, 128 Mb hash > >Junior 6a using all available tablebases (220 files, 5.63 Gb) >Both systems running Win2000 Professional. > >As I mentioned before - my intention was to continue until one program has won >10 games. It took a while... > >Here is the summary (reproduced manually, as Chessbase interface doesn't allow >cut & paste from this screen - a bummer): > > > 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 >------------------------------------------------------------------------- >D. Junior = 0 1 = 0 = = 0 = 0 = 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 = = 1 0 = = 0 1 = = = = 1 17.0 >C. Tiger = 1 0 = 1 = = 1 = 1 = 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 = = 0 1 = = 1 0 = = = = 0 14.0 > >Deep Junior - Chess Tiger 17.0 : 14.0 (+10 -7 =14) > > >Given the hardware differrence, this is dead even. I understand from it that 2xCeleron 563 is faster than p3 667 What is the speed difference for Junior? What could be the speed difference for tiger(assuming tiger could use more than 1 processor and earn the same speed like Junior from 2xCeleron relative to 1 Celeron)? Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.