Author: James Robertson
Date: 11:28:13 03/25/00
Go up one level in this thread
On March 25, 2000 at 13:41:28, Roger wrote: >Would tablebases for Tiger have changed this result at all? > >Roger Maybe a quarter of a point.... My experience with tablebases is that if the program is moderately smart it doesn't benefit tremendously from them. James >-------------------------------- > >On March 25, 2000 at 08:56:05, Peter Kasinski wrote: > >> >>Junior 6a - 2 x Celeron 563 Mhz, 256 Mb hash, 32 Mb tablebase hash >>Tiger 12e - P3 667 Mhz, 128 Mb hash >> >>Junior 6a using all available tablebases (220 files, 5.63 Gb) >>Both systems running Win2000 Professional. >> >>As I mentioned before - my intention was to continue until one program has won >>10 games. It took a while... >> >>Here is the summary (reproduced manually, as Chessbase interface doesn't allow >>cut & paste from this screen - a bummer): >> >> >> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 >>------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>D. Junior = 0 1 = 0 = = 0 = 0 = 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 = = 1 0 = = 0 1 = = = = 1 17.0 >>C. Tiger = 1 0 = 1 = = 1 = 1 = 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 = = 0 1 = = 1 0 = = = = 0 14.0 >> >>Deep Junior - Chess Tiger 17.0 : 14.0 (+10 -7 =14) >> >> >>Given the hardware differrence, this is dead even. >> >>There are several enjoyable games, the fastest win is 30 moves, one quick draw >>after 24. The pgn file with Junior's annotations is 90Kb in size. Zipped 30Kb. I >>will email it to anyone interested. >> >>PK
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.