Author: James Robertson
Date: 11:35:59 03/25/00
Go up one level in this thread
On March 24, 2000 at 23:35:53, blass uri wrote:
>[Event "?"]
>[Site "?"]
>[Date "????.??.??"]
>[Round "?"]
>[White "tal haimovich"]
What is his rating?
>[Black "fritz6"]
>[Result "1/2-1/2"]
>[ECO "A06"]
>[Annotator "Blass,U"]
>[PlyCount "105"]
>
>{65536kB, Jun-book.ctg. Pentium
>} 1. Nf3 Nf6 2. e3 d5 3. b3 c5 4. Bb2 e6 5. d4
>Nc6 6. Bd3 Bd6 7. O-O O-O 8. Nbd2 Qe7 9. Ne5 cxd4 10. exd4 Ba3 11. Bc3 Nb4 12.
>Bxb4 Qxb4 13. Ndf3 Bb2 14. a3 Bxa3 15. Ra2 Qe7 16. Qa1 Bd6 17. Rxa7 Rxa7 18.
>Qxa7 Nh5 19. c4 f6 20. Ng4 Nf4 21. Bc2 dxc4 22. bxc4 e5 23. Ne3 exd4 24. Nd5
>Nxd5 25. cxd5 Qc7 26. Qa2 Bg4 27. Nxd4 Bxh2+ 28. Kh1 Qe5 29. Bd1 Qxd4 30. Bxg4
>f5 31. Kxh2 fxg4 32. d6+ Kh8 33. Qe6 Rd8 34. Rb1 Qf4+ 35. Kg1 Qxd6 36. Qxd6
>Rxd6 37. Rxb7 h5 38. Rb5 g6 39. Rb7 Rd2 40. Kf1 Kg8 41. Kg1 Rc2 42. Kf1 Rc1+
>43. Ke2 h4 44. Rb4 h3 45. gxh3 gxh3 46. Rh4 Rc3 47. f3 Rc2+ 48. Kd3 Rh2 49. Ke4
>Rh1 50. Kf4 Kf7 51. Kg3 g5 52. Rxh3 Rg1+ 53. Kf2 1/2-1/2
>
>[Event "?"]
>[Site "?"]
>[Date "????.??.??"]
>[Round "?"]
>[White "Deep Junior"]
>[Black "arnold hasidovski"]
>[Result "1/2-1/2"]
>[ECO "C11"]
>[Annotator "Blass,U"]
>[PlyCount "75"]
>
>{65536kB, Jun-book.ctg. Pentium
>} 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. e5 Nfd7 5.
>f4 b6 6. Qh5 g6 7. Qh3 c5 8. Nf3 Nc6 9. Be3 a6 10. Be2 Bb7 11. O-O cxd4 12.
>Nxd4 Bc5 13. Nxc6 Bxc6 14. Bxc5 bxc5 15. Qh6 Qe7 16. b3 Qf8 17. Qh3 Qe7 18. Nd1
>O-O 19. Nf2 Kg7 20. a4 a5 21. Bb5 Rfc8 22. c4 d4 23. Bxc6 Rxc6 24. Ne4 Rb8 25.
>Rf3 f5 26. Nd6 Rxd6
This is a really good exchange sac; what was DJ expecting, and do other programs
think it is a good move?
>27. exd6 Qxd6 28. Qg3 Nf6 29. Qe1 Rb4 30. Rd1 Ne4 31. Qh4
>h5 32. Qe1 Qb6 33. Rdd3 Qd8 34. h3 h4 35. Rf1 Qf6 36. Rff3 Qe7 37. Qa1 Qf6 38.
>Qb2 1/2-1/2
>
>I think that hasidovsky had good chances to win by 38...g5 39.fxg5 Nxg5 40.Rf1
>e5 but this 2176 player was afraid to take risks and agreed to draw.
>
>Computer may be GM level against GM's but this games prove that computer are
>probbly not GM level against weak players because I expect GM's to do better
>against 2200 and 2300 players.
I guess computers are hard to beat and difficult to lose to if you close the
position. :)
James
>
>Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.