Author: Marek Soszynski
Date: 15:59:51 03/25/00
Go up one level in this thread
On March 24, 2000 at 07:28:36, Shep wrote: >On March 22, 2000 at 16:11:25, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>On March 22, 2000 at 04:10:02, Shep wrote: >> >>> >>>These are the positions which are not found by Deep Junior 6.0a in 100 seconds >>>on a quad PIII: >>> >>>13,21,25,52,62,65,71,75 >> >>What were the moves and evaluations that Junior 6.0a did choose? > >I'll see if I can get this info (all I got was the info "solved/not solved") or >ask for a re-run if the quad is still available for that task. > >>I think a few of the positions have errors and alternatives are as good or >>better. > >Agreed. Especially the ones mentioned above. :) > >--- >Shep Here are my brief comments on some of the numbered positions. #13 This (Tartakower-Rubinstein/Moscow/1925) also appears in the LCTII Test Suite. #52 I suggest you play 1...Bf5 and consider White's alternatives to the game continuation (2.Qxa8 Qd6+ 3.Kc1, etc.). The question then is whether 1...Qd6+ is just as (or nearly as) good eventually. #65, and #71 Though these had a place on Dan Corbit's 16-item "disagree list," they do not appear on the latest one, which has been reduced to 10 items. (Ask Dan the reasons not me.) #75 I suggest you play 1.Bxf4 and then wait to see what Junior's evaluation is at depth=16. It should realise that White is winning at depth=17. Marek Soszynski
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.