Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 08:54:00 03/26/00
Go up one level in this thread
On March 25, 2000 at 21:46:54, Laurence Chen wrote:
>On March 25, 2000 at 21:21:55, Mogens Larsen wrote:
>
>>:o)
>Perhaps you can show me the math. A Celeron is a Pentium II modified chip
>running at 66 MHz Bus, and the Pentium III running at 667 MHz is a coppermine
>chip running at 100 MHz chip. Are you telling me that a dual Celeron running at
>66 MHz bus is faster than a Pentium III running at 100 MHz? Could you show me
>some benchmarks to prove it? The way I see it, it is like driving in a freeway,
>the Celeron got 6 lanes and the Pentium III has 10 lanes, and which freeway
>would get more congested?
>Laurence
Laurence,
Junior was DEEP JUNIOR RUNNING ON TWO PROCESSORS.
Something else: I have no accurate benchmarks, but I think that running on a
Celeron and running on a PIII makes very little difference for Tiger.
One month ago I was on the move and had to work on a PIII-450. I was very
disappointed with it. Tiger was slower than on my K6-2 400MHz!!!
Maybe Peter could do a comparative benchmark of Tiger running on the Celeron and
Tiger running on the PIII. I expect the speed difference to be close to the
clock frequency difference.
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.