Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 18:19:16 03/26/00
Go up one level in this thread
On March 26, 2000 at 17:28:24, Chessfun wrote: > >Hi, >I have analysed this game and looked at it from both >white and black's viewpoint. Which one...if any do you >think is/maybe using a computer? > >[Event ""] >[Site ""] >[Date "2000.03.26"] >[Round "-"] >[White "-"] >[Black "-"] >[Result "*"] > >1. c4 e5 2. Nc3 Bb4 3. Nd5 Be7 4. d4 c6 5. Nxe7 Qxe7 6. dxe5 Qxe5 7. Nf3 >Qc5 8. b3 Nf6 9. Bb2 Qe7 10. g3 O-O 11. Bg2 d6 12. O-O Bg4 13. h3 Bf5 14. >e3 Nbd7 15. Qd4 c5 16. Qc3 Rab8 17. Rad1 Be4 18. Nh4 Bxg2 19. Nxg2 Rfd8 20. >Nf4 a6 21. Rd3 Ne5 22. Rdd1 Nfd7 23. Nd5 Qf8 24. f4 Ng6 25. h4 f6 26. Rf2 >Ne7 27. Rfd2 Nxd5 28. Rxd5 Nb6 29. R5d3 Nc8 30. e4 Re8 31. e5 dxe5 32. fxe5 >Rxe5 33. Rd8 Re8 34. Rxe8 Qxe8 35. Re1 Qc6 36. Qd3 Nd6 37. Re6 Rd8 38. h5 >Qc7 39. Qd5 Nf7 > > >Thanks. Hmm.... Good question. The opening is quite unusual (Shirov attack?). Personally I'm not sure any of the players are computers. A move like 10.g3 isn't a typical computer move because they're not partial to fianchettos IMHO. If it's a book move then it means nothing. And wouldn't a computer playing black go for the c pawn with 6... Qb4+ instead? The exchange of white squared bishops isn't typical either. Sorry, I can't do better at 4am and I have to go watch the Oscars. Best wishes... Mogens
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.