Author: blass uri
Date: 00:19:30 03/27/00
Go up one level in this thread
On March 27, 2000 at 01:56:29, Tony Hedlund wrote: > >Junior shouldn't have lost game 2 but Fritz is very good in endgames. > >Tony Junior can blame only itself for the fact that it lost. It could draw by repetition if it wanted to do it but it did not want to do it. I think that in this example one of the changes in the evaluation function of Junior(reduced value of pawns) was not productive. I am not sure what was the losing mistake of Junior but by some analysis with the computer I found that after 100.Kg5 white is losing(I guess that the losing blunder was before move 100 but I am not sure about it). It seems that Fritz is going to be again number 1 in april. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.