Author: Mark Young
Date: 01:00:40 03/27/00
Go up one level in this thread
On March 27, 2000 at 03:19:30, blass uri wrote: >On March 27, 2000 at 01:56:29, Tony Hedlund wrote: > >> >>Junior shouldn't have lost game 2 but Fritz is very good in endgames. >> >>Tony > >Junior can blame only itself for the fact that it lost. >It could draw by repetition if it wanted to do it but it did not want to do it. > >I think that in this example one of the changes in the evaluation function of >Junior(reduced value of pawns) was not productive. > >I am not sure what was the losing mistake of Junior but by some analysis with >the computer I found that after 100.Kg5 white is losing(I guess that the losing >blunder was before move 100 but I am not sure about it). > >It seems that Fritz is going to be again number 1 in april. > >Uri Fritz 6a is impressive...in many positions (not all) no program can touch it. Fritz can show a uncanny understanding that is very human like. Amir once said that Fritz can not conduct a queen side attack...well Fritz 6a sure can. The dame thing will minority attack you to death.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.