Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 08:27:54 03/27/00
Go up one level in this thread
On March 27, 2000 at 09:08:59, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>On March 26, 2000 at 11:45:38, Christophe Theron wrote:
>
>>On March 25, 2000 at 23:13:49, Tina Long wrote:
>>
>>>On March 25, 2000 at 14:28:13, James Robertson wrote:
>>>
>>>>On March 25, 2000 at 13:41:28, Roger wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Would tablebases for Tiger have changed this result at all?
>>>>>
>>>>>Roger
>>>>
>>>>Maybe a quarter of a point.... My experience with tablebases is that if the
>>>>program is moderately smart it doesn't benefit tremendously from them.
>>>>
>>>>James
>>>>
>>>Ed Schroder said about 6 months ago that Tablebases were worth about 10 points
>>>on the SSDF scale.
>>>
>>>I'm 70% sure he said that! I'm 100% sure that Ed said once that something was
>>>worth very little rating points.
>>>
>>>I'm glad I could add some real detail to this discussion.
>>>
>>>Tina Long
>>
>>
>>As far as I know, endgames are not Tiger's weak point.
>>
>>One thing I'm sure about: as far as playing strength is the subject, I have a
>>long list of ideas that, in my opinion, will give much more than tablebases.
>>
>>It does not matter if tablebases are easy to implement or not (they are not,
>>unless you want to do it the dirty way, and I won't), I don't see the point in
>>working on this before I fix more important things.
>>
>>
>>
>> Christophe
>
>
>I am not wild about helping the competition, but you have one huge hold. You
>don't know that KPB vs K is a draw if the wrong colored bishop is on the board.
>Ditto for KPPB vs K, assuming all P's are rook pawns. I have seen Crafty draw
>lost endings when you let it swindle you into such an ending. One ending
>was you had a king, and pawns on a and b file + wrong bishop. Crafty had a pawn
>on the a file. It pushed and you took with your b pawn rather than just pushing
>past it and winning...
>
>Consider that my tip of the year. :)
>
>There are others. But I also have them too. :)
Well... Thanks Bob.
I thought Tiger knew about KBP vs K, but I'll check again. Or maybe you noticed
this on an old version of Tiger.
I admit I still have to cover some of the other cases. I'll probably do it, as I
prefer to have the knowledge than to rely on endgame databases. Tiger will
eventually have EGTB support, but I want to allow my users to not load them on
their hard disks. For many occasional players, it does not make sense to stuff
their disks with 1Gb of chess databases.
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.