Author: James Robertson
Date: 09:42:09 03/28/00
Go up one level in this thread
On March 27, 2000 at 22:16:29, Dann Corbit wrote: >On March 27, 2000 at 22:07:51, Jason Williamson wrote: > >>As perviously mentioned >> >>Comet B18 9.5 >>Gnuchess 0.5 > >This one is not an astonishment. Comet is a real bear and Gnuchess (while not a >[cough] pansy) is not a top-ten engine. On the other hand, I would have >expected something like 7-3, but with a ten game match, anything can happen. > >>Not Gnuchess5, had some problems with it in the past and decided to do without. >>I expected a better fight from Gnuchess, and now wish perhaps to have used a >>differnt engine. >> >>TCB 9.5 >>Lambchop 0.5 > >Hmmm... TCB is a real powerhouse but Lambchop is a very strong engine. You >might look over your settings for Lambchop. Check also to see if TCB was >pondering or some such folly. When I run TCB in matches it uses processor time (>50%) even when the other program is thinking and it is not pondering. Do you have any ideas to fix this? James > >>Fixed the book and TCB just mangled Lambchop. Is this result as nutty as it >>looks? I have never played with lambchop before this, so I don't really have >>any indications of its strength. I do know that TCB is quite strong, possibly >>in the top five amatuer engines. >> >>The next match to take place tonight will be quite interesting: >> >>Anmon 5.06 >>Little Goliath 2000 Version 2.6 >> >>Don't know how to call this one, though I suspect the edge might go to LG2000. > >I agree, but AnMon is a real tiger. I would not be surpised to see AnMon come >out on top in a ten game match.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.