Author: Anatoli
Date: 15:17:32 03/30/00
Go up one level in this thread
It sounds for me that Alterman created the book for Junior overnight. Of course they simply used his name to advertise the program. But unfortunately he has done his job very badly. At least he had to spend another 30 minutes to delete girls under 10 games from the database. I think everybody who has a ChessBase can do a better job. And I reckon a 120 Mb or something book is too small for such a progran as Junior-6. I created a book for myself and it is bigger then 1 Gb. And of course there are no girls-boys games. And I can't imagine how could I play without this book in the world level e-mail tournaments. On March 30, 2000 at 02:32:46, blass uri wrote: >On March 29, 2000 at 23:42:32, Lawrence S. Tamarkin wrote: > >>I think you have over-simplified your opinion about the different opening books >>that go into making the books for the programs. I think a lot of thought goes >>into making the best available book, especially for a program like Fritz6 or >>Junior6 which has large books, (over 120 mbs), and also has 'Tournament use' >>turned off at default, because the program is designed to aim for positons from >>the book that favour its best play. Also, I specifically bought Junior6, >>because the opening book was prepared by GM Boris Alterman. > >I also thought that GM will do a better book and I see that I was wrong because >when I look at Junior's games I see that Junior does not get a better position >in most of the games against computers. > >I suspect that alterman did not work seriously for improving Junior's book and >the only reason that they gave a GM to work for Junior's book is not to improve >Junior's book but to tell customers that the book was prepared by a GM. > >It also seems that the book is based on games and there is no case when Junior >plays a move that was not played in more than one game if you optimize book for >playing and I think that it is a mistake. > >I read that in one of the games of Junior against zarkov one of the moves(Qxb2) >was marked by ? but Junior did not find a move that was played in more than one >game so it had to calculate and finally played the bad move Qxb2. > >I do not understand it because if alterman analyzed the relevant position and >found that Qxb2 is bad then Junior should play the move that alterman believes >that is best without caring about number of games. > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.