Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Computer Correspondence Chess Challenge

Author: blass uri

Date: 10:43:06 03/31/00

Go up one level in this thread


On March 31, 2000 at 12:53:43, Stephen Ham wrote:

>Dear Readers,
>
>I know many of you are actively following my ongoing match games versus Fritz 6a
>and Nimzo 7.32. For those of you not familiar with the event, please visit:
>
>http://correspondencechess.com/campbell/index.htm
>
>Anyway, a frequent poster here (name is withheld) wrote to Mr. Campbell stating
>that since the chess engines are displaying their top 3 choices, they are being
>weakened "a lot". No explanation was given for that claim.
>
>Would somebody here please provide a detailed explanation regarding whether this
>claim is correct and why?
>
>The chess engines are on settings recommended by ChessBase USA as their optimal
>settings for this event. My extremly limited understanding is that displaying
>the top 3 choices does indeed affect the chess engines, but it causes them to
>spend more time on what it believes to be the 3 best moves. As such, this sounds
>like an enhancement to me. Given that the chess engines are allowed about 24
>hours calculation time on weekdays and are searching to 16-18 ply, I can't
>imagine that this weakens them in any way.

This weakens them because they could search 17-19 plies without searching for
the second and third best moves.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.