Author: Stefan Meyer-Kahlen
Date: 03:05:35 04/01/00
Go up one level in this thread
On March 31, 2000 at 10:35:12, Eric Trudel wrote: >On March 31, 2000 at 09:46:25, Harald Faber wrote: > >>On March 31, 2000 at 07:35:35, Eric Trudel wrote: >> >>>On March 31, 2000 at 04:19:27, Stefan Meyer-Kahlen wrote: >>> >>>>On March 30, 2000 at 19:22:38, Marc van Hal wrote: >>>> >>>>>During my testing of personeletys for Rebel CenturyI saw actualy that >>>>>Schreder4's playing style looked a lot like Rebel10 with antigm I also wanted to >>>>>get the setings with Rebel century but thi didn't work with Rebel century 1 but >>>>>worked with Rebel century 1.2 the only thing I changed there was the >>>>>pawnstructure on 105 >>>>> passed pawns on 105 >>>>>selectivety on 120 >>>>>pins on 120 >>>>>kingsafety 120 >>>>>atractivenis on 125 >>>>> and search methode on deepest >>>>> most of all I saw that putting selectivety on 120 and pins on 120 made Rebel a >>>>>better positional player.(wich works for all personeletys) >>>>>But ok that was Rebel Century. >>>>>Now the settings for Schredder4 the only thing wich changes there is kingsafety >>>>>on 120 >>>>>selectivety on 20 >>>>>passed pawns on 105 >>>>>pawnstructure on 105 >>>>>And the result was Schreder4 became stronger then the original against Schreder >>>>>himself and also against other chessprograms it will finisch games more quickly >>>>>too. >>>>>I only have to warn you that if you are going to play 5 minute games or other >>>>>blitzers selectivety on 120 can be dangerous but works exelent with games with a >>>>>time control of 30 minutes a game or more. >>>>>Have fun with the settings,I also posted this on the general chess site where it >>>>>actualt doesn't belong sorry for that. >>>>>Marc van Hal >>>> >>>>Could you please post more details about your games, e.g. how many games and >>>>against which opponents did you play? >>>> >>>>Stefan >>>OK I played some games. >>>Check it out-- >>>30min per side on a Pentium 3 550, 128MB ram. >>>Each side got 48MB of Hash. >>>here are the scores. I called the new settings shredder2001: >>> >>>shredder2001-shredder4 (10.5-5.5) +7 =7 -2 >>>I like it! Of course more games are needed, but it looks pretty sweet to me. >>>Bye, >> >>It would be better to play another opponent, try Tiger, Junior or Fritz, once >>play Shr4 and afterwards Shr2000. > > >Hi Harald, >You are right about playing other programs like fritz and Junior. The only >problem is I have one computer and not much time to play a bunch on 30min games >by hand :) I'm sure you understand. >Anyways I got the final score between shredder 4 and shredder 2001. (I only >named it shredder2001 cause I couldn't think of anything else) the final score >was as follows: >shredder2001 vs. Shredder4 13.5-6.5 (+9 =9 -2) >So not to bad for the new settings that's for sure! >Like you said I should try to play other opponents first, but I think the >results still hold a "shred" of meaning. Get it, "shred" hehehe. OK bad joke :( >Anywho I think I'll use these new settings for now on. >Bye-Bye. >Eric What are your settings? Stefan
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.