Author: Chessfun
Date: 07:56:43 04/01/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 01, 2000 at 08:18:51, Frederic Friedel wrote: >Amazingly it never occurred to anyone -- Thompson, Stiller, Nalimov -- to run >through the ending K+N+N vs K. Everyone assumed it was simply a draw in every >case. Well, fire up your Nalimov tablebase generator and prepare for a shock! In >over 10% of all legal positions the attacking side can forced a mate in 31 to 48 >moves. It is difficult to do anything systematically with the tablebase after it >has been generated (except play against them), but as far as I can tell the >attacking side can force a win if the defending king is on one of the squares >a1, b1 or a2 and the attacking king and at least one knight is within the square >a1-d1-d4-a4. Naturally this can be reflected in all four corners of the board. >Some of the mates are wonderfully intricate and involve forcing the king to >move to a4 (or d1) and back again to a1. John Nunn is studying the ending and >will provide a better statistical evaluation soon. I'll stick to the two messages I posted on the subject last week. In the Oops (again) thread. It isn't possible. Thanks. I honestly felt it kinda pointless....stating unless by mutual consent, seems I was wrong. Thanks.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.