Author: blass uri
Date: 13:33:24 04/02/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 02, 2000 at 15:46:54, Dave Gomboc wrote: >It sounds like your tunable policy paid off, in terms of people discovering good >adjusted parameters? > >Dave Chess knowledge=25 is not an idea of me. I suggested to use it only after I read in Ed's site that Ed found that it is an improvement against computers and maybe also an improvement against humans. I found also (after I read that Ed found that knowledge=25 is an improvement) that Rebel(knowledge=0) does not lose in a result of almost 60:0 against Rebel(chess knowledge=500) at 7 plied depth and it convinced me that Rebel knows some important things even with knowledge=0. I think that the numbers of the chess knowledge parameter were misleading and the minimal number should be clearly bigger than 0. I believe that this is the reason that people did not try to reduce the chess knowledge parameter in the Rebel century personality contest. Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.