Author: blass uri
Date: 13:33:24 04/02/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 02, 2000 at 15:46:54, Dave Gomboc wrote: >It sounds like your tunable policy paid off, in terms of people discovering good >adjusted parameters? > >Dave Chess knowledge=25 is not an idea of me. I suggested to use it only after I read in Ed's site that Ed found that it is an improvement against computers and maybe also an improvement against humans. I found also (after I read that Ed found that knowledge=25 is an improvement) that Rebel(knowledge=0) does not lose in a result of almost 60:0 against Rebel(chess knowledge=500) at 7 plied depth and it convinced me that Rebel knows some important things even with knowledge=0. I think that the numbers of the chess knowledge parameter were misleading and the minimal number should be clearly bigger than 0. I believe that this is the reason that people did not try to reduce the chess knowledge parameter in the Rebel century personality contest. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.