Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Athylon 800 vs top program playing style

Author: Jeremiah Penery

Date: 12:38:44 04/04/00

Go up one level in this thread


On April 04, 2000 at 11:48:35, Tom Kerrigan wrote:

>On April 04, 2000 at 07:53:30, Laurence Chen wrote:
>
>>It could be that crafty uses SSE in the code, and that improves the speed of
>>searching in Crafty.  SSE is properitery of Intel, and Athlon does not and
>>cannot support SSE, and instead of SSE, AMD replaces this part of code with 3D!
>>Now.
>
>If you do many similar floating point operations, you can use SSE to optimize
>your code.
>
>Crafty doesn't do any floating point operations, so using SSE is impossible.
>
>It's possible that Crafty uses MMX for some stuff. I kind of doubt it, but MMX
>might be used to speed up some 64-bit operations. AMD's chips have always done
>MMX operations much faster than Intel's chips, so that would tend to make the
>K6/Athlon faster than the PIII.

Wouldn't MMX stuff be rather non-portable?

I think part of the reason is that as long as MSVC is used to compile it, Crafty
has some Intel-tuned assembly code for heavily used time-critical code.  The
stuff will work on AMD, I think, but it will be slower.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.