Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Computer Correspondence Chess Challenge

Author: Stephen Ham

Date: 09:05:16 04/05/00


Dear Readers,

Thanks for the valuable input from your replies to my earlier post. I can now
officially state that my silicon opponents, Fritz 6a and Nimzo 7.32 will no
longer display their 2nd and 3rd move selections in their correspondence match
games with me, on a go forward basis.

We always intended to give the chess engines optimal conditions. We now
understand that over a 24 hour period, they may now be able to search another
ply deeper, say from 18-ply to 19-ply, which is deemed to be meanigful. Also,
the fear that many Correspondence Chess players have, of playing a weak human
who relies entirely upon top quality hardware/software, can now be tested. We
presume that such a weak player, knowing his/her limitiations, would not care
what moves the computer rejects and only wants the strongest move found after
calculating for 24 hours or so. Thus our experiment now follows that path. While
my commentary to the match now loses the ability to comment upon the chess
engines candidate moves, we get even stronger opposition...we lose something
entertaining but gain something more meaningful (read: stronger).

Here's a group thank you to those who contributed their knowledge. Thank you!

Stephen Ham



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.