Author: Ren Wu
Date: 11:46:07 10/08/97
Go up one level in this thread
On October 07, 1997 at 03:43:50, Walter Ravenek wrote: >My second attempt to fit the results in a table. Apparently the first >one was to wide. > >===================================================================== >CCC-I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > bm bm bm bm bm bm bm bm bm am bm > Rxe6 Bxg7 Ng4 Nxf7 Rc3 Qxh6 Rh3+ Bd4+ Rxh7 Qxf3 b3 >===================================================================== >10 DarkThought 0:00 0:12 2:31 ---- ---- 4:20 0:14 0:00 0:00 4:42 0:21 > 9 Rebel9 2:09 0:18 0:42 1:07 ---- ---- 0:44 ---- 0:48 1:09 0:07 > 8 Fritz5 0:04 0:14 0:08 1:50 ---- ---- 2:11 ---- ---- 0:35 0:05 > 7 Arthur 0:09 0:09 0:57 ---- ---- ---- 0:00 0:04 0:01 ---- 0:06 > 3 CSTal ---- 0:02 0:14 ---- ---- ---- ---- 0:07 ---- ---- ---- >===================================================================== > >Walter Ravenek Here is the result of Initiative. My P6 is busy on other things and this is on a slow Pentium 133, with 20 MB hashtable. Pos1 18 sec. Pos2 207 sec. Pos3 186 sec. Pos4 - Pos5 - Pos6 - Pos7 0 sec. M15 Pos8 3 sec. correct move, score +3.93, didn't see mate Pos9 1 sec. M17 Pos10 183 sec. M7 Pso11 345 sec. (Just over 5 minutes) Ren.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.