Author: Harald Faber
Date: 02:38:52 04/07/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 07, 2000 at 05:18:09, Tony Werten wrote: >On April 07, 2000 at 05:04:02, Harald Faber wrote: > >>On April 07, 2000 at 04:48:05, Tony Werten wrote: >> >> >>>I don't. I'm just stating that if you want the best under-21 player, you look at >>>his results against other under-21's. Not at his results against above 21's, >>>because these have nothing to do with his being champion under 21. >>> >>>If you want the best program, you should look at his performance against other >>>programs. >>> >>>Tony >> >> >>Sorry, I disagree again. > >Yes, at least we seem to be agreeing on that. > >>If there are already results from this program (and there ARE) against humans, >>one should take a look at them. And as there are other programs competing humans >>too, it is easy to compare the programs in their performance against humans. >>And as the main part here for the dutch Ch is to play comp-human one should >>consider the former results of comp-human and NOT comp-comp. > >One could, but then you're meassering something different. >If you do it like this, the best under-21 player would be the one with the best >results against over-21's. Which is different from the under-21 champion. Fine, that is exactly what I wrote before. :-)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.