Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Computers in national championships

Author: Harald Faber

Date: 03:32:20 04/07/00

Go up one level in this thread


On April 07, 2000 at 06:08:17, Jeff Nouveau wrote:

>On April 07, 2000 at 05:41:43, Harald Faber wrote:
>
>>On April 07, 2000 at 05:08:06, Jeff Nouveau wrote:
>>
>>
>>>So, I think we agree on the fact that we need 3 sets of rules for these 3
>>>disciplines.
>>>
>>>I sincerely think that we can find a set of rules that will permit comp-human
>>>competition on fair basis. And I think we need it : many of us want to know :o)
>>>
>>>Jeff
>>
>>What are your suggested conditions?
>>Should humans be allowed to use opening books? Why (not)?
>
>Many simple ideas have been suggested in this forum, and I think they are worth
>experimenting :
>
>1-Use of database (only database, no engine of course ;o),

For OTB play? I am not sure how big the influence of a large book is for the
program and the human. I'd assume the human to really know his opening
repertoire so that the benefit is not so big.

>2-Incremental time control,

No problem.

>3-Maybe ending tablebases, if the computer have them.
>
>I don't think we need much more than that. With this kind of conditions, I'm
>sure we respect everyone's work : player, programmer, opening book maker...
>
>What do you think ?
>
>Jeff

I have come to no conclusion.
Major point of course are the databases, opening and endgame. Computers can
access them very easily. Humans also have their opening database / opening book
in mind. It is smaller, no doubt. But would the human (IM/GM) profit from a real
database instead of only relying on his memory? What about endgame databases? I
think many humans are stronger in endgames than comps even with TBs. Humans know
HOW to play pawn and rook plus pawn endings, assuming more than 2-3 pawns each
side. On the other hand these TBs have surprised even John Nunn in some
positions where humans with their knowledge mis-evaluated some positions. But
how important are they for practical play? I don't know.
And, finally, every opening book, no matter how large it is, has some holes in
it.




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.