Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 10:17:00 04/07/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 07, 2000 at 13:09:49, Roy Brunjes wrote: >On April 07, 2000 at 09:49:38, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: > >>On April 07, 2000 at 09:11:50, Bertil Eklund wrote: >> >>>On April 07, 2000 at 07:03:33, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >>> >>>>I have these Fritzmark figures with F6a and 64 MB hash: >>>> >>>>PII-300 290 KN/S >>>>PIII-500 475 KN/S >>>>PIII-550 515 KN/S >>>>PIII-600e 580 KN/S >>>>PIII-750 717 KN/S >>>> >>>>Maybe others will post their results with different CPUs. Bertil and Tony: what >>>>about your AMD 450? >>>> >>>>Enrique >>> >>>Hi! >>> >>>AMDk6-2 450 452 kn/s >>> >>>I guess that you know that these numbers are for F5.32 >> >>I know this and I just realized that the Fritzmark doesn't reflect the speed of >>Fritz 6a, so it is quite useless. For instance, F6a is 33% faster on my P600e >>than on my P500, while the Fritzmark shows a sppedup of 22%. >> >>> and you have to install >>>F6 again after this test. >> >>One has to load F6a again, yes. I guess we better forget about Fritzmarks. >> > What? After running the Fritzmark benchmark, you need to reapply the F6a >patch?? Why? No, no. You only have to load again the engine you want. Fritz loads F532 to run the Fritzmark and then "forgets" to load the engine that was there before. No panic. :) Enrique >>Thanks, Bertil. >> >>So, is Fritz 6a on top of your list? I mean, of course it is, but by how much? >> >>Enrique >> >>>Bertil
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.