Author: Bertil Eklund
Date: 03:41:25 04/08/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 08, 2000 at 00:49:25, Chessfun wrote: >On April 07, 2000 at 11:56:59, Andreas Schwartmann wrote: > >>On April 07, 2000 at 09:11:50, Bertil Eklund wrote: >> >>>On April 07, 2000 at 07:03:33, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >>> >>>>I have these Fritzmark figures with F6a and 64 MB hash: >>>> >>>>PII-300 290 KN/S >>>>PIII-500 475 KN/S >>>>PIII-550 515 KN/S >>>>PIII-600e 580 KN/S >>>>PIII-750 717 KN/S >>>> >>>>Maybe others will post their results with different CPUs. Bertil and Tony: what >>>>about your AMD 450? >>>> >>>>Enrique >>> >>>Hi! >>> >>>AMDk6-2 450 452 kn/s >>> >>>I guess that you know that these numbers are for F5.32 and you have to install >>>F6 again after this test. >> >>AMD K6-III 450 (64 MB hash tables): 480 kN/s >> >>So the K6-III really is better for Fritz, it's even faster than a P-III 500! >> >>Andreas > > >These results startle me. >Cel 433 64 mb hash = 273, lower than the PII 300 :-( >Thanks. Hi! Maybe you checked the Fritz-mark instead of kn/s. I think my Fritz-mark was in the low 3 houndreds.Please recheck. I have a friend with two Celerons and it is equal or better (clockwise) than P3 for most programs. Bertil
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.