Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 05:52:04 04/08/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 08, 2000 at 06:41:25, Bertil Eklund wrote: >On April 08, 2000 at 00:49:25, Chessfun wrote: > >>On April 07, 2000 at 11:56:59, Andreas Schwartmann wrote: >> >>>On April 07, 2000 at 09:11:50, Bertil Eklund wrote: >>> >>>>On April 07, 2000 at 07:03:33, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >>>> >>>>>I have these Fritzmark figures with F6a and 64 MB hash: >>>>> >>>>>PII-300 290 KN/S >>>>>PIII-500 475 KN/S >>>>>PIII-550 515 KN/S >>>>>PIII-600e 580 KN/S >>>>>PIII-750 717 KN/S >>>>> >>>>>Maybe others will post their results with different CPUs. Bertil and Tony: what >>>>>about your AMD 450? >>>>> >>>>>Enrique >>>> >>>>Hi! >>>> >>>>AMDk6-2 450 452 kn/s >>>> >>>>I guess that you know that these numbers are for F5.32 and you have to install >>>>F6 again after this test. >>> >>>AMD K6-III 450 (64 MB hash tables): 480 kN/s >>> >>>So the K6-III really is better for Fritz, it's even faster than a P-III 500! >>> >>>Andreas >> >> >>These results startle me. >>Cel 433 64 mb hash = 273, lower than the PII 300 :-( >>Thanks. >Hi! > >Maybe you checked the Fritz-mark instead of kn/s. I think you are right and Chessfun posted the Fritzmark result. A PIII-500 scores 330 and a PII-300 202, which seem proportional to her 273 on a Celeron 433. Enrique > I think my Fritz-mark was in >the low 3 houndreds.Please recheck. >I have a friend with two Celerons and it is equal or better (clockwise) than P3 >for most programs. > >Bertil
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.