Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 07:54:05 04/08/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 08, 2000 at 09:01:42, blass uri wrote: >If you are right then I think that it is very important to prove it. >I know that the autoplayer has problems and there are some cases of errors >but I want a proof that there are more errors with shredder. i want to see any proof that giordano bruno was a heretic. i want to see the proof, for he was burned. >Enrique played many public games between shredder and the chessbase programs >with the autoplayer. and ? was there any proof ? they won. sio what was proven ? only that the autoplayer IS cheating, or ? We throw the witch into water, and if she swims she is a witch, and if she sinks, she wasn't. >please prove that there are errors that shredder cannot reproduce and that there >are significantly less errors that Junior,Fritz,Nimzo,Hiarcs cannot reproduce. errors ? the results are different. statistically relevant result differences with autoplayer and without. >The ssdf can send their results with shredder and other programs to somebody >else and (s)he who did not buy the programs can post the results without telling >who told him(her) the results. >In this case you cannot prove that the ssdf is responsible for the results >because it can be somebody else with similiar hardware. i don't think this is legal. try it out. and you will see. >You can do nothing against it so I think that it is absurd to try to take legal >steps against the SSDF. we will see. >I think that people should avoid buying your program if you take legal steps >against the ssdf. why ? i would say the opposite ! buy the program BECAUSE they take legal actions. for that there is truth about the autoplayer. :-)) >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.