Author: Pete Galati
Date: 20:35:48 04/08/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 08, 2000 at 22:20:48, Jason Williamson wrote: >On April 08, 2000 at 20:40:07, Pete Galati wrote: > >>On April 08, 2000 at 19:53:41, stuart taylor wrote: >> >>> So does junior 6 have the greatest knowledge or not? How did it fall so >>>much? If you would take its recent results without mixing them with the old, >>>then it would be even worse! how do the programs fluctuate so much from one >>>2-month period to the next? maybe some technical reasons? or maybe fritz 6 >>>had technical problems which are now corrected? I mean fritz 6 was behind junior >>>on last ss list also. >>> I wish I knew better where programs are holding. >>>S.Taylor >> >>Are you talking about ssdf? I don't think it's a matter of Junior falling at >>all, probably more a matter of what games got played & how the programs get >>paired up. I'm sure Junior is as good as it ever was, I've considered buying >>Junior, I might do it _this_ century, maybe not, who knows. But I doubt if I'd >>let ssdf influence me. >> >>Pete > >I would consider buying deep junior if there was some winboard connectivitiy to >the net. Or some other way other then auto232. You know what, I was just over at the Chessbase site, and then the USA Chessbase site too. And I couldn't find the system requirements for their programs, they've found a way to hide that info (Hey Steve Lopez, what gives?) so I don't have any idea if I could use Junior on my old computer or not. The cool thing about the _old_ programs (that are all way stronger than me anyhow), is that they _all_ run on my computer. Pete
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.