Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 07:55:00 04/09/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 08, 2000 at 13:50:39, blass uri wrote: >On April 08, 2000 at 13:02:56, Daniel Chancey wrote: > >>How about we compare the Deep Blue games with the Fritz 6 games. also compare >>Kasparov's games. Who's better? >> >>Castle2000 > > >Kasparov is clearly better than Fritz. > >Uri I don't see why kasparov would have won a match against Fritz or any other pc program if he would play on the same level as against deep blue II. kasparov made on average 4 to 6 bad moves a game against deep blue. Even what kasparov did in game 1 is pathetic. It's incredible he still won it. he won that game because of some laughable pawn moves of deep blue. Pawn handling of deep blue seems to be completely forgotten in evaluation, though some of the mistakes also get made by most of todays software. Kasparov in good games doesn't make a single mistake. Against the average top GM kasparov makes at most 1 bad move a game. Against deep blue kasparov has made in 6 games on average 4 to 6 bad moves. no matter what the cause of that bad play is, it's unforgivable. the only one to blame is kasparov. Kasparov got paid big dollars. Kasparov played like IM. Kasparov sure didn't play well. Kasparov would lose against any computer showing such play. Kasparov would lose against me too showing such play. If kasparov plays me i'm sure he wipes me blindfolded, making less mistakes as he did against deep blue. Kasparov is blindfolded stronger as he showed against deep blue. Kasparov has blamed everyone on this world and accused everyone on this world from doing things wrong. Why doesn't he just admit he played there the worst games of his life? Vincent
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.