Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 11:39:23 04/09/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 09, 2000 at 10:45:36, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > > >On April 09, 2000 at 02:44:22, Tom Kerrigan wrote: > >>On April 08, 2000 at 13:02:56, Daniel Chancey wrote: >> >>>How about we compare the Deep Blue games with the Fritz 6 games. also compare >>>Kasparov's games. Who's better? >>> >>>Castle2000 >> >>We don't have enough DB games for an intelligent comparison. >> >>-Tom >in the few games db has played it has made major positional mistakes >though, especially building up after opening. Now no program plays >that stage perfect, but the mistakes that db has made even a >very small IM could have at least drawn or won that against DB, >a single mistake doesn't lose a game, but making 4 to 6 bad moves >a game usual lose a game, especially against IMs that fight you in >a (half)closed position. > >In important games i make LESS than 4 mistakes a game. > >Vincent Maybe so. But no matter how "many" DB made, it _won_. That is the difference between you and DB. And if it wins, then maybe they aren't "mistakes" after all...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.