Author: Harald Faber
Date: 22:16:19 04/09/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 09, 2000 at 23:57:18, stuart taylor wrote: >On April 09, 2000 at 03:41:28, Harald Faber wrote: > >>On April 08, 2000 at 19:53:41, stuart taylor wrote: >> >>> So does junior 6 have the greatest knowledge or not? >> >>Certainly not. >________________________________________ >Do you mean certainly not because another program certainly has more knowledge? >or not necesarily, but maybe different knowledge? >________________________________________ I mean certainly not. :-) I am sure at least MCP and Hiarcs have more knowledge. >>> How did it fall so much? >> >>What are you talking of? >>______________________________________ >ssdf rating list-where the new games pulled it down so much-mixed with the older >games. >_______________________________________ It was only a bit and will raise again after the Fritz6-match. >>>S.Taylor >> >>Junior6 is an excellent program, IMO it is in the leading group with Shredder4 >>and Tiger, a bit above the others. (Rebel also seems to be very strong and maybe >>Fritz counts to this group) >_______________________________________ >How can Shredder be in the leading group if it is-about 7th. place on selective >Search rating list? The SSRL does not mean anything to me, the ratings are based on a mixture of SSDF games and some private tests. So it counts apples and oranges. >And how do you single out Rebel which is much lower down >even still? Which Rebel is lower? Century has no autoplayer so I doubt that there are enough games to say so. I have seen Century games, it is VERY strong. > I'm not saying the list is the final evidence, but it usually must be quite >close. How do you know differently? Following watching games. :-) >regards, >S.Taylor >_______________________________________
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.