Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 17:28:50 04/10/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 10, 2000 at 10:00:40, Stefan Meyer-Kahlen wrote: >On April 10, 2000 at 09:00:39, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On April 10, 2000 at 06:10:22, Jouni Uski wrote: >> >>>Has anybody found good values for TB cache with 3+4 piece tablebases and 5 piece >>>set (compressed Nalimov of course)? Is it different? Or is 4 MB always enough? >>>Is same value good under Fritz and Winboard? thanks >>> >>>Jouni >> >> >>Here is what I do on a machine with decent memory, assuming I am playing in >>a tournament that is playing long time controls: >> >>memory=512mb >> >>hash=384M >>hashp=32M >>cache=32M >> >>which leaves 64M for the O/S and filecache buffers. >> >>works well for me. In general, egtb cache is only important in egtb positions, >>but then it is very important for performance. > >I haven't seen much difference for Shredder if I set the tb cache to 1 or 32 or >256 MB. Any comments? > >Stefan Depends on the position... I ran several tests last year when Eugene first got this stuff going, and I decided that for ICC level time controls, 32mb was a good number. I rarely see my NPS drop drastically. It all depends on the position and how many different databases are getting probed...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.