Author: Bertil Eklund
Date: 23:20:57 04/11/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 11, 2000 at 19:25:40, Dave Gomboc wrote: >On April 10, 2000 at 16:54:31, Bertil Eklund wrote: > >>On April 10, 2000 at 07:39:08, Stefan Meyer-Kahlen wrote: >> >>> >>>I and also my distributor Ossi Weiner already agreed to publish Shredder's >>>results together with the games in the current SSDF list, before the current >>>list was published on Saturday. >>> >>>Stefan >> >>Hi! >> >>As soon as we are allowed to publish the results of all Millenium engines >>Shredder4 is included. One hour before the publishing of the list we received a >>letter, that said we wasn't allowed to publish the results for any other program >>(CC:Stefan Meyer-Kahlen). >> >>I think it is of big interest to include not only the excellent Shredder4 but >>also Zarkow, Wchess and Genius. >> >>Bertil > >For whatever reason(s), there is not a problem with Shredder's rating being >published, but there is a problem with some of the others being published. It >seems unreasonable to refuse to report the rating of one chess engine because >you disagree with the licence agreement of a different engine. I suggest that >the SSDF take what it can get and publish Shredder's rating in its lists, now >that they have permission to, and continue to lobby re: the other engines. > >Dave Hi! I strongly disagree. Do you really think this is fair? Everyone knows the strength of Shredder4. For me it looks that they for some reason don't like the publishing of the results for the "weaker" programs. If Cb released one weaker engine, should we don't publish the results for that engine? Bertil
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.