Author: Ritter Rost
Date: 00:51:56 04/12/00
Go up one level in this thread
>And I'm just saying again, "What does it matter to you?" I am interested in an independent and strong SSDF which does not have to fear legal threats if they want to publish test results. This matters a lot to me. >Are you being bullied or prosecuted - No >Are the people being "bullied & prosecuted" publishing the results anyway - Yes. No they are not. See several posts of Bertil Eklunds on the matter. Ossi Weiner forbade them to publish the results of Genius, Zarkov and WChess. >My view from here is you are Anonomously trying to bring a private conflict into >a public forum. For computer chess the authenticity and independence of the SSDF as the only major testing institution is not a private matter. Nor is the behaviour of the major software publishers. > >The major achievement of this is a lot of discussion about the legality of your >original post & the possibility that CCC or the Moderators could be in legal >trouble because of Your post. CCC is a healthy, strong and commercially independent forum which can survive a little controversy as long as it remains free of _personal_ attacks, Tina. Some excitement here and there may even help to raise the number of visits/members. Furthermore there is no need to refer to my unthoughtful original post which has been thankfully deleted. I am simply quoting SSDF member Bertil Eklund in this thread. Bottom line: I would like the SSDF to be allowed to publish all test results. At the moment this is not the case. Bertil Eklund said that Ossi Weiner asked them to suppress the results of Genius, Zarkov and WChess, Ritter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.