Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Shredder in the SSDF list

Author: Albert Silver

Date: 12:25:25 04/12/00

Go up one level in this thread


On April 12, 2000 at 03:51:56, Ritter Rost wrote:

>>And I'm just saying again, "What does it matter to you?"
>
>I am interested in an independent and strong SSDF which does not have to fear
>legal threats if they want to publish test results. This matters a lot to me.
>
>>Are you being bullied or prosecuted - No
>>Are the people being "bullied & prosecuted" publishing the results anyway - Yes.
>
>No they are not. See several posts of Bertil Eklunds on the matter. Ossi Weiner
>forbade them to publish the results of Genius, Zarkov and WChess.
>
>
>>My view from here is you are Anonomously trying to bring a private conflict into
>>a public forum.
>
>For computer chess the authenticity and independence of the SSDF as the only
>major testing institution is not a private matter. Nor is the behaviour of the
>major software publishers.
>
>>
>>The major achievement of this is a lot of discussion about the legality of your
>>original post & the possibility that CCC or the Moderators could be in legal
>>trouble because of Your post.
>
>CCC is a healthy, strong and commercially independent forum which can survive a
>little controversy as long as it remains free of _personal_ attacks, Tina. Some
>excitement here and there may even help to raise the number of visits/members.
>
>Furthermore there is no need to refer to my unthoughtful original post which has
>been thankfully deleted. I am simply quoting SSDF member Bertil Eklund in this
>thread.
>
>Bottom line: I would like the SSDF to be allowed to publish all test results.

I find this whole discussion a mystery unless Swedish laws are radically
different from those of many countries. Who is preventing the SSDF from
publishing their results? Ossi Weiner? Millenium? The 'user-agreement'??? To my
knowledge the user-agreement is not above the law (though perhaps it is in
Sweden, I don't know) so that even if I signed it in blood, it would be
unenforceable as it has no legal power. It could just as well demand that I
paint my hair blue for the next 10 years, so what?

                                          Albert Silver


>At
>the moment this is not the case. Bertil Eklund said that Ossi Weiner asked them
>to suppress the results of Genius, Zarkov and WChess,
>
>Ritter



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.