Author: Frederic Friedel
Date: 13:52:13 04/12/00
Go up one level in this thread
>I think it comes down to my feeling that SSDF exists best as an independent >organization, like e.g. Consumer Reports. If you start picking sides to favour >or disfavour somebody, that brings into question the legitimacy of your list. >Instead, publish everything you're allowed to... and this now includes a rating >for Shredder 4. Does Consumer Reports have to get permission from the manufacturers of each product whether it can be tested or not? Can and has a manufactuere successfully instructed Consumer Reports not to publish the results of a test? How exactly can you aim to be "independent" if you have to abide by such instructions? Just curious to know.
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.