Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: rating delta of 60-100 elo

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 15:05:43 04/12/00

Go up one level in this thread


On April 12, 2000 at 17:49:23, Wayne Lowrance wrote:

>A uscf expert player friend of mine of about 40 years ago told me a player 100
>uscf points higher than its opponent could/should expect to win 7 to 8 games out
>of ten. I took that to mean 70 to 80 percent as 10 games is too few.
>
>Can the same be expected of chess programs playing each other when the cpu clock
>is doubled on one of the programs. (60 to 100 ELO points superior).

Win expectency for a difference of 0 points is 0.5
Win expectency for a difference of 100 points is 0.359935
Win expectency for a difference of 200 points is 0.240253
Win expectency for a difference of 300 points is 0.15098
Win expectency for a difference of 400 points is 0.0909091
Win expectency for a difference of 500 points is 0.0532402
Win expectency for a difference of 600 points is 0.0306534
Win expectency for a difference of 700 points is 0.0174721
Win expectency for a difference of 800 points is 0.00990099
Win expectency for a difference of 900 points is 0.00559197
Win expectency for a difference of 1000 points is 0.00315231

Remember that these numbers are *averages* and do not apply to a single result.
In other words, it is not unimaginable for someone 100 points below in ELO to
have a 4-0 result against the better player.

Win expectancies are related to the pool for which data is available, and the
larger the number of contests, the more secure the figures are.




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.