Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 06:32:35 04/13/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 13, 2000 at 09:25:49, Jorge Pichard wrote: >I have seen different Websites and almost all have LG2000 2.5 rated second after >Crafty Fallowed by AnMon 5.6 as the third rated Winboard program. I agreed so >far with those rating, but last week I started to test the newer version of >Gromit 3.0 Versus Lg2000 2.5 and against AnMon 5.06. Either the testers were >using a different processors than I was producing different result, or the >settings and opening books were differents, I used an AMD K6 II 500 Mhz and the >result for Gromit 3.0 were much higher than either Lg2000 2.5 and AnMon 5.06. >The time for the first test was set to game in 15 minutes per side, using >Winboard version 4.07 and the same computer with 128 Mb of RAM. Gromit Score >28.5 games out of 50 against Lg2000 2.5 and 31 to 19 against AnMon 5.06. Now I >was very upset simply because my favorite program Lg2000 2.5 lost to Gromit 3.0, >but when I tested against Anmont 5.06, I finally realized that Gromit was way >underated. Then I tested them once more, increasing the time control to game >in 30 minutes per side, and again Gromit 3.0 won both matches, this time the test was shorter >only 30 games and Gromit score 16.5 out of 30 games against Lg2000 2.5 and >against AnMon 5.06 Gromit Score 18 to 12. Now what is wrong with this picture? >Gromit 3.0 clearly beat the crap out of the two leading programs in the Winboard >rating list. Why does Gromit has such a low rating on all Winboard Rating List?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.