Author: Francesco Di Tolla
Date: 07:37:39 04/13/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 12, 2000 at 12:12:01, Chris Carson wrote: > FIDE >S/W Mp MHZ TPR SSDF >Hiarcs 6 PII 350 2611 2624 450 MHZ for SSDF [...] >Novag S. Constellation 6502 4 1555 1731 I'm a physicist and I learned that measurements never give pure numbers, but you always need an error-bar, so you statements make little sense unless you explain how big the error bars of the scores agains humans (based on few games I guess) are indicated as well. We all now the confidence of SSDF data that's why I ask the other data. > >Based on the above, the micro's had 14 performances above >thier SSDF ratings against FIDE opponents and 15 performances >below. The SSDF list is very valid and reliable. You see if the comparison you make are based on on data which have and big error bar you migh consider saying that the two data are not distinguishable within the error and get different numbers. regards franz
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.