Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Shredder in the SSDF list

Author: Enrique Irazoqui

Date: 10:38:33 04/13/00

Go up one level in this thread


On April 13, 2000 at 13:28:45, Thorsten Czub wrote:

>On April 12, 2000 at 16:52:13, Frederic Friedel wrote:
>>Does Consumer Reports have to get permission from the manufacturers of each
>>product whether it can be tested or not?
>
>the programmer or the company that owned the copyright sells the licence
>agreement.

The license agreement of Millennium doesn't say a word about not publishing
results of their programs: Shredder 4, Genius 6.5...

There are no restrictions of this sort, therefore this is not an issue.

>if the programmer or the company owning that right, does not want the customer
>to do something with the product, the licence agreement
>is not accepted by the company.
>the customer can send the product to the distributor and gets the money back.
>if you buy a book, you accept the copyright laws of the country you buy the
>book. you are e.g. not allowed to print those books again in and sell them
>for your own. therefore you would need again the allowance of the publishers
>or the writer.
>same with programs.
>washing machines are of course different matter. or cars.
>
>>Can and has a manufactuere successfully
>>instructed Consumer Reports not to publish the results of a test? How exactly
>>can you aim to be "independent" if you have to abide by such instructions?
>
>the ssdf are not independent.

Ah! Do you mean:

- they are biased
- they are bought

>>Just curious to know.

So am I. Could you develop, preferably with some evidence?

Enrique



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.