Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 10:41:41 04/13/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 13, 2000 at 05:40:00, Frederic Friedel wrote: >I think what the SSDF needs is the moral support of the computer chess >community. its not a question of morals. it is a question of system-immanent failures and manipulations in testing procedures they use. if they allow ONE company (ChessBase) to betray with a special device, the moral question is up to this company. >They are private citizens who for many years have been providing an >invaluable service to this community, at considerable personal expense >(especially in terms of time) and without any personal gain. If they are >attacked they should be vigorously defended, smoking is not dangerous says mr. malboro. = the ssdf should be defended says mr.chessbase. whats this ? a joke ? > not given dispassionate legal >advice (this does not apply to your post, which provides factual and moral >support). I'm sure Thoralf Karlsson and Bertil Eklund have no desire to spend >months in Swedish and German courts, testing the validity of the advice. any person has to be in charge for what he does or says. we are adults. this is not a playing ground where parents are in charge for their children. if thoralf and/or bertil want to be adults they shall do what they do. by all risks and all means.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.