Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Shredder in the SSDF list

Author: Mike S.

Date: 10:44:43 04/13/00

Go up one level in this thread


On April 12, 2000 at 03:51:56, Ritter Rost wrote:

>I am interested in an independent and strong SSDF which does not have to fear
>legal threats if they want to publish test results. This matters a lot to me.
>(...)
>Bertil Eklund said that Ossi Weiner asked them
>to suppress the results of Genius, Zarkov and WChess,

In connection with this issue, I'd like to ask:
Let's say an IM manages to reach some brilliant wins against Shredder 4: Does he
have to keep those games secret, or must he replace Shredder's name by N.N. to
be able to publish them (assuming the license conditions are still the same as
with Shredder 3)?

I'm asking this, because it's my opinion that pure chess moves and the
information which appears in a PGN header, should not be copyrighted or
otherwise restricted in any way. Of course, if there's doubt about the
correctness of such a game score *after it's been published*, it should be
possible to place a comment or contradiction - but to restrict a publication
beforehand, is censorship.

Regards,
M.Scheidl



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.