Author: blass uri
Date: 14:36:54 04/13/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 13, 2000 at 13:44:43, Mike S. wrote: >On April 12, 2000 at 03:51:56, Ritter Rost wrote: > >>I am interested in an independent and strong SSDF which does not have to fear >>legal threats if they want to publish test results. This matters a lot to me. >>(...) >>Bertil Eklund said that Ossi Weiner asked them >>to suppress the results of Genius, Zarkov and WChess, > >In connection with this issue, I'd like to ask: >Let's say an IM manages to reach some brilliant wins against Shredder 4: Does he >have to keep those games secret, or must he replace Shredder's name by N.N. to >be able to publish them (assuming the license conditions are still the same as >with Shredder 3)? I understood that your assumption is not correct and there are no restrictions about publishing results of shredder4. I also do not think that they have the right to forbid publishing games. It is absurd to try to do it because it is easy to send the games to someone who did not buy shredder and did not agree not to publish the games. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.