Author: Jason Williamson
Date: 21:48:30 04/13/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 13, 2000 at 13:41:41, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On April 13, 2000 at 05:40:00, Frederic Friedel wrote: > >>I think what the SSDF needs is the moral support of the computer chess >>community. > >its not a question of morals. >it is a question of system-immanent failures and manipulations in >testing procedures they use. >if they allow ONE company (ChessBase) to betray with a special >device, the moral question is up to this company. > >>They are private citizens who for many years have been providing an >>invaluable service to this community, at considerable personal expense >>(especially in terms of time) and without any personal gain. If they are >>attacked they should be vigorously defended, > >smoking is not dangerous says mr. malboro. >= >the ssdf should be defended says mr.chessbase. > >whats this ? a joke ? > > >> not given dispassionate legal >>advice (this does not apply to your post, which provides factual and moral >>support). I'm sure Thoralf Karlsson and Bertil Eklund have no desire to spend >>months in Swedish and German courts, testing the validity of the advice. > >any person has to be in charge for what he does or says. >we are adults. this is not a playing ground where parents are in charge >for their children. >if thoralf and/or bertil want to be adults they shall do what they do. >by all risks and all means. All I can say is: Boycot Millenium products until such time as they stop harassing sddf. I find it odd that we don't hear any accusations from the Rebel camp against chessbase. Hmm maybe they aren't as paranoid and deluded as others seem to be. I think I will buy Deep Junior and Rebel Tiger. Jason
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.