Author: Bertil Eklund
Date: 06:50:19 04/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 14, 2000 at 07:51:51, blass uri wrote: >On April 14, 2000 at 06:01:30, Stefan Meyer-Kahlen wrote: > >>On April 13, 2000 at 17:21:26, blass uri wrote: >> >>>On April 13, 2000 at 13:37:13, Thorsten Czub wrote: >>> >>>>On April 12, 2000 at 21:56:06, Dave Gomboc wrote: >>>>>I suspect that Millennium GmbH would have an extremely tough time winning in >>>>>court against the SSDF if they did publish results for Genuis 6.5, WChess, etc. >>>>>Nonetheless, it appears that they feel that bullying independent citizen groups >>>>>is a successful marketing strategy. I can only shake my head. >>>> >>>>look : ssdf published results that are not played out on the base >>>>of a fair competition. the results have been influenced by the autoplayer >>>>device. >>>> >>>>millennium company has nothing against a fair competition. >>>>if the ssdf e.g. would (as they have done over the years with the dedicated >>>>machines) >>>>test by hand, nobody would complain. >>>>but they use the chessbase autoplayer device. >>>>the results of this device differ from the device other companies use. >>>>therefore the results are somehow irrelevant. >>>>but the ssdf do nowhere print in their publications that their results >>>>have been "arranged" or "generated" with the >>>>chessbase autoplayer device which is not generally trusted by agreement >>>>of all programmer paricipating in the list. >>>>they do only publish numbers. stupid numbers. >>>>i see no other way for millennium company to forbid to publish those silly >>>>data, than threatening them. licence agreements in europe do count for swedish >>>>people to. you can believe me. it might be different in US, but many things >>>>are different in US. >>>> >>>>i would do exactly the same if it would be my product. >>>>if somebody would publish lies about my girl-friend or lies about my >>>>friends, he would get also similar kind of answer. >>>>printing lies is not a fair way of competition and not a fair way >>>>of an "independant organisation". >>> >>>Printing games and results of games is not printing lies. >>>If the autoplayer of chessbase help chessbase then it is important to prove it >>>but I saw no proof for it. >>>The fact that you get different results may be because you do not use the same >>>hardware and is not a proof that the autoplayer of chessbase helps chessbase. >>> >>>The ssdf guys tested shredder4 and sent all the games with logfiles to the >>>programmer and stefan found no problem with the results. >>>shredder4 is probably number 3 after Fritz and Junior. >>> >>>Stefan has no problem with printing the games and the results of shredder4 but >>>the ssdf do not want to give information about shredder if they have not the >>>right to print information about other programs of the millenium. >>> >>>Uri >> >>I didn't get any log file. >>Stefan > >I apologize. >I believed another person about it but I guess that you know better than him. > >Uri Hi! If I have the the time later this evening (from my home) I can send you some of the games with the same included log files that we have sent to Stefan. As I know you are the "master-checker" I guess you can find if there is anything dubious in the games. Bertil
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.