Author: Tom Kerrigan
Date: 09:05:20 04/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 14, 2000 at 08:10:36, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On April 13, 2000 at 13:38:33, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: > >>The license agreement of Millennium doesn't say a word about not publishing >>results of their programs: Shredder 4, Genius 6.5... > >the company says. > >>There are no restrictions of this sort, therefore this is not an issue. > >if the company wants to make an issue out of it, they have all rights >to do so. > >>Ah! Do you mean: >> >>- they are biased >>- they are bought > >Ah ! > >>So am I. Could you develop, preferably with some evidence? > >>Enrique > >why ? >would this change anything about the facts ? No, the evidence itself would obviously not change the facts. However, it would lend credibility to your story. If I told you that "Jack and the Beanstalk" was a true story, I bet you would like to see some evidence, too. You keep saying that the SSDF games are freely available and it's no problem to tell that they're rigged. So why don't you just find a few of these rigged games and post them here with your analysis? Maybe there's some sort of misunderstanding, and presenting your "evidence" in public could clear things up. >or about the biasing of testers writing for their pr-magazins ? >the ones who are biased would not accept the fact that they are. >and the ones who publish do only publish biased stuff, therefore they >biase testers. > >you should know better enrique, you are one of them. No personal attacks. This is against CCC rules and you know it. -Tom
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.