Author: Stefan Meyer-Kahlen
Date: 09:57:14 04/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 14, 2000 at 00:48:30, Jason Williamson wrote: >On April 13, 2000 at 13:41:41, Thorsten Czub wrote: > >>On April 13, 2000 at 05:40:00, Frederic Friedel wrote: >> >>>I think what the SSDF needs is the moral support of the computer chess >>>community. >> >>its not a question of morals. >>it is a question of system-immanent failures and manipulations in >>testing procedures they use. >>if they allow ONE company (ChessBase) to betray with a special >>device, the moral question is up to this company. >> >>>They are private citizens who for many years have been providing an >>>invaluable service to this community, at considerable personal expense >>>(especially in terms of time) and without any personal gain. If they are >>>attacked they should be vigorously defended, >> >>smoking is not dangerous says mr. malboro. >>= >>the ssdf should be defended says mr.chessbase. >> >>whats this ? a joke ? >> >> >>> not given dispassionate legal >>>advice (this does not apply to your post, which provides factual and moral >>>support). I'm sure Thoralf Karlsson and Bertil Eklund have no desire to spend >>>months in Swedish and German courts, testing the validity of the advice. >> >>any person has to be in charge for what he does or says. >>we are adults. this is not a playing ground where parents are in charge >>for their children. >>if thoralf and/or bertil want to be adults they shall do what they do. >>by all risks and all means. > >All I can say is: >Boycot Millenium products until such time as they stop harassing sddf. I find >it odd that we don't hear any accusations from the Rebel camp against chessbase. > Hmm maybe they aren't as paranoid and deluded as others seem to be. > >I think I will buy Deep Junior and Rebel Tiger. Both are excellent programs. You'll love'em. Stefan > >Jason
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.